Can’t win, Dems? Then blame the Russians
The Russians are like the devil. Each gets blamed (or credited) with more than they are responsible for.
Intelligence officials recently went to Capitol Hill where, according to The Hill, “they briefed the House Intelligence Committee about Russia interfering in the presidential race in an effort to get Trump re-elected.” The initial presumption was that Russian President Vladimir Putin favors Donald Trump’s re-election.
Why would he when he has someone more closely associated with his ideology than Trump? That would be the self-described Democratic Socialist, Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Following closely on this unspecific leak to (where else?) The New York Times, we now hear that Russia wants Sanders as the next president.
Perhaps it’s out of gratitude because he and his wife honeymooned in the Soviet Union.
The intelligence briefing was classified, but as with charges that Russia meddled in the 2016 election, no details have emerged that prove the Russian “collusion” narrative.
Other than disinformation campaigns on social media (and plenty of disinformation has and will continue to be generated here at home through mainstream media) we have still not heard any specifics on how Russia managed to change a single vote in 2016, or how they supposedly intend to do so this time around.
Upon hearing of the intelligence briefing, Putin’s press secretary told Russian state-run media:
“This is another in a series of paranoid reports, and we regret to say that their number will grow as the election approaches. They certainly have nothing to do with the truth.”
The reason Democrats are again raising the prospect of Russian interference is to undermine the credibility of this year’s election should Trump win again, as seems increasingly likely.
Democrats have been unable to stomach, not only his 2016 election, but also his economic successes.
They fear that their party will lose whatever remaining but dwindling appeal it might still enjoy.
That’s why in the debates among Democratic presidential candidates one hears of an America that isn’t recognizable to most citizens.
For them, America is a bad country, a place of racism, sexism, inequality and misery only they can fix, though previous Democratic presidents who have made similar diagnoses of America’s “faults” have done nothing to repair the damage to which they have arguably contributed.
Trump appears to have stolen their issues and they have developed no fallback position.
As for the credibility of American intelligence, consider their record during George W. Bush’s administration, beginning with weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which were never found, resulting in the deaths of many in the war that followed.
This Russian interference claim seems like a setup and an invitation for the House to conduct more investigations and possibly new articles of impeachment after the election, assuming Democrats maintain their House majority.
A recent Gallup poll shows record high approval (49 percent) of the president’s policies.
Forty-three percent of independents polled now support the president — the highest percentage during Trump’s entire presidency.
Russia has become the default boogeyman of the left.
That is what makes Bernie Sanders the ideal candidate for Russia and the other socialist-communist states he has praised, because in his heart he is at one with them.