×

Biden’s deplorable lies might not even be in his partisan interest

How do you explain why an ultra-experienced politician makes a major speech on the behalf of a legislative goal that is doomed to fail and unpopular with voters? Especially when his speech is boycotted by the bill’s backers and consists of one lie after another?

President Joe Biden’s speech in Atlanta on Jan. 11 raised these questions. The speech purported to rally support for the Democrats’ legislation to impose federal standards on voting in all 50 states. It doesn’t even seem to have the support of all 50 Senate Democrats, but if it does, it is sure to be the subject of a GOP filibuster.

Biden’s calls for Democrats to abolish filibusters for voting laws are opposed by Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, and others.

At the same time, organizations advocating Biden’s changes pointedly boycotted his Atlanta event. So did Stacey Abrams, the Georgia legislator who claimed, two years before then-President Donald Trump made similar claims, that she had actually won the 2018 Georgia governor’s race, which she lost by 54,000 votes.

Abrams, who is running again this year, said she had a scheduling conflict. Obviously, this was a “shocking snub,” as one critic put it, of Biden and of Vice President Kamala Harris, who accompanied him. But it was not as shocking as the big lies in Biden’s speech.

Start with the title of his “Freedom to Vote Act,” which implies that Americans are not already free to vote. Go on to his peroration: “Do you want to be on the side of Dr. King or George Wallace? Do you want to be on the side of John Lewis or Bull Connor? Do you want to be on the side of Abraham Lincoln or Jefferson Davis?”

The implication is that anyone who favors requiring photo ID for voters is on the same side as those who proclaimed “segregation forever.”

This passes over the embarrassing fact that Wallace, Connor and Davis were partisan Democrats. Connor was Alabama’s Democratic National Committeeman at the time he directed police dogs and fire hoses at peaceful demonstrators in Birmingham in 1963.

Biden campaigned as a practitioner of comity who would bring people together. Instead, he accuses those repealing the election rules passed in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic of being supporters of slavery and segregation.

Biden’s stand is out of line with public opinion. An Echelon Insights poll showed that 47% of voters favor returning to pre-pandemic voting procedures versus 41% who favor making the changes permanent.

Those numbers are similar to the partisan balance.

They also reflect differing partisan interests. For most of the 79 years of Biden’s life, most marginal voters have been downscale, transient and more Democratic than Republican. The rule was that high turnout helped Democrats. That’s no longer clear, as Trump accelerated the pre-existing trends of upscale voters toward Democrats and downscale voters toward Republicans.

If anyone has been suppressing votes, they haven’t done a good job at it. The 21st century has seen rising voter turnout.

Turnout has only decreased, compared to four years prior, in the two most recent years when Democratic presidents have run for re-election: 1996 and 2012. It has risen when Republican presidents have run for re-election: By 16% in 2004 and again in 2020.

Republican turnout increases of 11 million re-elected George W. Bush in 2004 and came within 42,000 votes of re-electing Trump. They also produced Republican gains in congressional and state legislative seats.

So the Democrats’ election bill, besides lacking the votes to pass, may not be in their own interest. This makes the big lies in Biden’s Atlanta speech all the more inexcusable.

Newsletter

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)
Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper? *

Starting at $2.99/week.

Subscribe Today