When coal miner John Morecraft heard that United Mine Workers of America President Cecil Roberts approved of President Joe Biden’s plan to move the nation’s energy industry away from fossil fuels, Morecraft said he anticipated the news would be misconstrued.

“I knew the story would come across as though all coal miners approved of this deal, with no mention of how (un)representative the UMWA is of the coal miner population,” said Morecraft, just before going down for his shift at the Bailey Mine here in Greene County, Pennsylvania.

“The UMWA in actuality represents a small portion of the people who work in the mines. What that means is that deal was not made with the support of most of the people who work in the industry.”

He is not wrong.

According to the U.S. government, there are 6,758 coal miners working underground in this country today who are members of the UMWA, compared with the 24,820 miners, such as Morecraft, who are not members of the union.

The same goes for the surface-mine workforce, where just over 3,000 are members of the UMWA, compared with the nearly 17,000 who are not.

Once a dominant force that represented virtually everyone working in the entire industry, the UMWA membership today is the smallest portion of the mining workforce.

Morecraft said there’s another component of the story many people might miss.

When deals like this are struck, or union bosses look the other way when the party they support hurts their jobs, he says it shows how the people who negotiate deals are entrenched within this administration.

Morecraft does not fit any of the stereotypes of coal miners. He is a college-educated former history teacher who coached both high school football and basketball until he was laid off from his teaching job.

Morecraft says he has been following in detail the proposals in the so-called “infrastructure bill,” which presently does include grants or loans to fund carbon capturing.

He is not sure if those grants will stay in there:

“What I don’t understand is why they’re not trying to put more money towards carbon-capture sequestration rather than displacing an entire workforce,” he said.

Carbon capturing is not embraced by Biden’s environmental-justice base.

Last year, when the House passed a clean energy package, 18 Democrats, including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley, all voted against it.

And some of the most influential liberal environmental groups also objected to that bill’s plan to capture carbon dioxide from coal- and gas-fired plants. For many of these groups, it was viewed as a bargain that only benefits fossil fuel companies.

“These people on the far left won’t even entertain the idea of carbon capture,” he said. “They just say, ‘No, fossil fuels are bad, and we need to go in a different direction,’ even though the technology isn’t quite there to even sustain the grid, as was shown in Texas this winter.”

In February, in the middle of an unexpected deep freeze, 3 million Texans lost their electricity when generating capacity could not meet demand.

Pipes froze and burst; people were left without heat and power for days; and the state’s power grid suffered a wholesale collapse. Morecraft says he loves his job.

“More reporters and elected officials should come and take a look at what we do,” he added. “It is not at all what they think; there are no picks and shovels. There are just a lot of misconceptions. There is also a lot of presumption that we don’t care about the climate, and that always gets me.

“Do people not understand that we live, drink, fish, raise our families and enjoy the wildlife right in the same place where the mines are located?”

In saying so, Morecraft echoes a frustration that energy workers frequently share.